On Management
| Written by: Jill Tydeman |
| Position: , E-Myth Worldwide |
| Article: Permalink |
| Category: Management |
| Tags: |
| Published on: August 30, 2007 |
| Article: Print View |
| Trackbacks: (37) |
| Comments: (7) |
The E-Myth Revisited proposes that owners of businesses that are not working should start again. This time they need to translate their vision into a management system, and to control their unpredictable employees through this system. I agree completely with this philosophy. My question is concerned with the practicalities of achieving this for a business with 25 employees. Sarah, in the book, had downsized to one, and moving forward was not complicated by any employees. How would you install a management system within an existing business with 25 employees, all of whom have been creating their own form of unpredictability? What difficulties do you envisage?
from Jill Tydeman
Thanks for your thoughtful question.
Your question is one that we have heard often here at
E-Myth:
"How do I get my people to do what I want?"
The answer that we give is the same whether you have 25 employees or 2 employees:
"You can't! You can't get your people to DO anything!"
As you've mentioned, the core philosophy behind the E-Myth Point of View on Management is the idea that businesses should be systems-dependent, NOT people-dependent. The secret of successful business management--successful people management--is systemization. Systems free your people to pay attention to the things that matter while all the routine things take care of themselves. Systems raise the level of performance of your people. The E-Myth management strategy is the same for companies with 2 employees, with 25 employees, or with 150 employees!
That being said, in Chapter 16 of The E-Myth Revisited, Michael Gerber expands on this answer by explaining that business owners have to create an environment for these systems in which doing it is more important to your people than NOT doing it. A place where doing it well becomes a way of life for them.
Sarah (the overwhelmed, overworked technician in The E-Myth Revisited) had indeed downsized. As the book describes, she "got small again" and retreated back into the infancy stage of her business's life cycle, after having stood on the threshold of growth and the adolescent stage. She had gotten lucky with the recruitment of a capable, enthusiastic employee named Elizabeth. She depended on this employee's skills and experience. And, she paid the price for this dependency when Elizabeth abruptly quit, leaving Sarah feeling abandoned and, again, overwhelmed.
In contrast, let's turn instead to the example of the hotel owner described in Chapter 16 as a model for the E-Myth approach to management. The owner of the hotel created a consistent, predictable, worthwhile experience for his customers. And, he did it through his employees.
So, how did he do it?
The owner communicated to his employees that they had an opportunity to make a choice, the RIGHT choice. He did it by making sure that all of his employees understood the IDEA behind the work they'd been asked to do. The owner got his employees excited and got their "buy-in" by expressing intentionally and specifically what the idea behind the work was, which is more important than the work itself. The hotel owner was looking for "players in his game" and his first step was to COMMUNICATE to them about what the rules of the game were at his hotel by sharing with them the IDEA behind his hotel.
You, as the business owner, must take full accountability for what's going on in your business in the area of management. Your first step is to undergo a fact-finding mission to find out what is currently true in your business through employee surveys and conversations with your managers. Finding out what is currently true in your business is KEY to planning your management strategy for the future.
Then, you must lead the company in the direction you intend it to go by setting standards through a management system in which all managers, and all those who would become managers in your company, are expected to produce RESULTS. These are the "rules of the game" and they are the foundation of your management system.
Once you have created these rules, you need to invent the way to manage it through systems. There are four components of these systems: How we do it here; how we recruit, hire, and train people to do it here; how we manage it here; and, lastly, how we change it here.
And, of course, all of these systems must be documented in your operations manuals, taught at your school, managed to, and improved upon, and discussed among you and your people.
You asked about difficulties we might envision in implementing a management strategy with your employees. Here at E-Myth, "difficulties" are seen as "opportunities." The best way to solve frustrations or bust through resistance presented by your employees is to establish a consistent and open place for them to discuss issues that come up during regular weekly meetings with you or their managers. You can then use these meetings to turn employee "issues" into opportunities for improvement in your system structure. Employees must feel heard by you or their immediate manager and, in turn, be respected for expressing their opinion! This will sustain their buy in to "play the game."
If you create a game worth playing, communicate and support employees who are excited about the game, and continue to improve the rules of the game, your business WILL consistently be a winning game for everyone involved in it!
*Edited at 03:30:06 PM on Aug 30 2007
Comments:
Joseph August 24, 2008 08:44:05 PM
Shem January 11, 2008 09:35:11 PM
I especially enjoyed the final paragraph where opperations are referred to as a game.
In our business we use a game board with "B-I-N-G-O" typed accross the top. The 5 X 5 board with 25 boxes forms a opperational map.
Each box has a task wich must be performed on a weekly basis. As the employee performs the tasks, she x's out the box. Five in a row earns a "BINGO" and a prize. A blackout wins an additional prize. The first person with a blackout wins an even greater prize. (May I suggest Starbucks gift cards and gasoline gift cards.)
Opperations is an easy aspect of the business when you approach it this way.
Feel free to contact me if you need help creating a system like this. I am not a "consultant" or anything other than a person who enjoys helping others. I have found I also often learn much in the process.
Shem Isaac
shem_isaac@hotmail.com
Sean January 10, 2008 02:40:37 PM
I can appreciate how difficult it is to accept the concept of starting over. But if you are a business owner and you know you need to make changes you will have to take the risk and move ahead. Some of your employees may quit or you may have to terminate some who have been with your company a long time. I think that if you are open and honest with your employees they will probably stay on and find new way to grow.
I have been working on making changes in our company for over five years. We are a family owned business and I have many times thought my efforts were being wasted. But I keep "preaching" about improving our systems and I have slowly implemented weekly meetings and regular "one-on-one" meetings with all our employees. It has taken some time but we are finally moving in the right direction. Only one person (other than family) is still with us from five years ago. And we are better for it. The crew we have now are better trained and work harder and are receiving better compensation. Soon we will be able to bring on some more people as we grow and our current people will be able to manage more areas of the business.
I have made it clear that we want everyone to buy-in and we are going after a certain type of customer. That requires constant affirmation and a clear vision. We are still formulating our vision as a company, as a family. But this plan of action we have been working out for the last five years has given us direction and a better feeling of teamwork that we ever had before. Our old way wasn't working. It's hard to change, very hard! But change you must!
Sean
Ron December 28, 2007 07:29:04 PM
I have to agree with the concerns of the other writers. While it seems wonderful in theory to come up with amazing new systems which will make everyone's life easier and increase the productivity of the company (and I do agree with this philosophy wholeheartedly) I do have some questions about how this would actually unfold in the real world.
I am in the process of leaving a company which has HUGE growth potential and some amazing employees. They/we consist of a dozen different people doing the same thing a dozen different ways every day. I can easily see that this is one of the main hinderances to this company moving ahead.
I myself have pushed my department as far as I can in the direction of operating in a systematic way and can go no further without support from management which I have given up on receiving (hence my decision to move on). However when I look at the task of getting buy in from employees who have been doing things "their way" for years and consider how impossible it is to get buy in for even the simplest changes, I can see why my employer is afraid to even attempt such a restructuring and so continues to focus on "managing people" and working "in" his company. (another reason for my decision to move on). I'd love to hear some first hand experiences that other have had. Surely replacing all the employees with new ones is not the answer.
Christine October 19, 2007 03:02:52 AM
hi
i think your article on management is a terrific motivator. what i would like to hear more about is how you work with employees whlie you are developing the systems in your business to give you the results you desire.
I have experienced that each time i wish to implement improvements to my management systems the employees are very reluctant to accomodate these changes and it usually ends up with that employee moving on and having to start again with someone new who is open to the new system. is this just a part of the adolescent business model or is it s function of my systems approach.?
regards liz
Hi
I have exactly the same qestion as Liz.
We have experienced the same results that she mentions, eitehr it is too much for the old employees to"get their head around" so they either don't make the adjustments or leave - leaving you with new ones who are willing to try anything as they don't knoww "the old ways" or the "good old days" when things werer easier for THEM.
I've just started Mastery Impact and am hoping the answers are going to present themselves :-)
Best, Rick
Donna September 4, 2007 09:30:24 PM
liz September 2, 2007 03:38:19 PM
hi
i think your article on management is a terrific motivator. what i would like to hear more about is how you work with employees whlie you are developing the systems in your business to give you the results you desire.
I have experienced that each time i wish to implement improvements to my management systems the employees are very reluctant to accomodate these changes and it usually ends up with that employee moving on and having to start again with someone new who is open to the new system. is this just a part of the adolescent business model or is it s function of my systems approach.?
regards liz





















hi my name joseph,i;m from Nigeria. how can i get a systems plan for a laundry outfit